6 Comments
User's avatar
Vennie Kocsis's avatar

This is poignant. I learned to measure apologies with behavioral patterns, noting that when there isn't behavioral adjustment, the apology is useless. Great breakdown of the dynamics of the apology.

The Exit Code's avatar

You’re right. Behavioral patterns are the only measure. Words change. Behavior either does or doesn’t. That’s your answer. That’s the clarity.

Splotchy's avatar

The other thing about a sincere apology is that it should be VOLUNTARY. Not extracted compulsorily by a boss, or other person useful to the narcissist.

Never demand an apology. This signals to the narcissist that it's something you want/need and they can take pleasure in either denying it, or giving a shallow 'I'm sorry YOU couldn't cope,' response, indicating that the blame is yours for being feeble/over-sensitive. Or, giving a 'I'm sorry, BUT.....' then listing all the things they want you to feel bad about.

It's important to limit their power and not expose soft white underbelly in pleading for anything. If they choose not to voluntarily apologise for something heinous, it simply confirms what you likely suspect/know about them.

The Exit Code's avatar

You’ve added something crucial: the voluntary element.

Demanding an apology gives the narcissist exactly what they need, proof that you want/need something from them. Now they have ammunition. They can deny it (confirming the lack of remorse), or give a fake apology that shifts blame back to you.

Not demanding protects your power. And their refusal to voluntarily apologize becomes the information itself: they won’t. And won’t tells you everything.

Shahrazad Nour's avatar

This gave language to something many survivors have struggled to explain for years. I especially appreciated that you shifted the focus away from how sincere an apology feels and back to what it actually contains.

The point about remedy being the only part that can only be proven over time really stayed with me. Hope often makes us want to believe that words, tears, or promises are enough. But lasting change is something we can only recognize through consistency.

What I also appreciate is that this doesn't encourage cynicism. It encourages observation. Instead of asking ourselves whether we should believe someone, we're invited to calmly notice what is present, what is missing, and what unfolds over time. That feels like a much steadier place from which healing can continue.

Thank you for another thoughtful piece.

The Exit Code's avatar

Thank you for this. You’ve named something crucial: the shift from “how does this feel?” to “what is actually present?”

The feeling can be performed. But the components either exist or they don’t. That objectivity removes the gaslighting from the equation.

What especially resonates is the distinction between cynicism and observation. Cynicism says nothing will change. Observation says let me watch what unfolds over time without hope or despair. And that’s profound because it’s neither naive nor defeated. Just clear-eyed. Just steady.

The point about remedy taking time is essential: it removes the pressure to believe in the moment. It gives permission to wait, to watch, to see if behavior actually changes. That waiting period is gathering information. And that information is what allows healing to begin.